Key Estate and Tax Planning Changes in New H.R. 1 Bill

Key Estate and Tax Planning Changes in New H.R. 1 Bill

On Friday, July 4, 2025, President Donald Trump signed into law the budget reconciliation bill H.R. 1 (the Act), formerly known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” The legislation extends several expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and makes changes to the federal tax code that will impact estate and tax planning strategies for high-net-worth individuals, families, and business owners. Below are five of the key provisions relevant to wealth and tax planning:

Estate, Gift, and Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Exemptions Increased

The Act eliminates the scheduled sunset of the current $13.99 million federal transfer tax exemption set to expire December 31, 2025. Instead, it permanently raises the federal lifetime exemption to $15 million for single filers (or $30 million combined for a married couple), effective January 1, 2026, and indexed annually for inflation thereafter.

Federal Income Tax Rates Made Permanent

The current personal income tax laws, including lower rates, higher standard deductions, and expanded income brackets, have been made permanent. The top marginal rate will stay at 37% in 2026 instead of reverting to 39%, as previously scheduled under the TCJA.

Qualified Business Income Deduction Extended

The Act makes permanent the 20% federal deduction of qualified business income (QBI) for qualifying business owners of pass-through entities, including S corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietorships, and some trusts. Phase-in thresholds are $75,000 for single filers and $150,000 for joint filers. The Act also introduces a minimum $400 deduction, indexed for inflation, for taxpayers with at least $1,000 in QBI. 

Charitable Giving Deduction Changes

For non-itemizing taxpayers, the deduction for qualified charitable donations increases to $1,000 for individuals and $2,000 for those filing jointly. Itemizing taxpayers can deduct donations only to the extent they exceed 0.5% of the filer’s contribution base. Carryovers are only permitted if this 0.5% threshold is met. The deduction limit for cash contributions to qualified charities rises from 50% to 60% of adjusted gross income (AGI).

State and Local Tax (SALT) Deduction Cap Raised Temporarily

The Act raises the SALT deduction limit to $40,000 per household, with a 1% annual increase, for tax years 2025 through 2029. A phase-down applies for individuals with a modified AGI above $500,000, with a minimum deduction of $10,000. Beginning in the 2030 tax year, the cap will revert to $10,000 for all taxpayers.

Take Advantage of Better Certainty for Long-term Planning

These changes create an opportunity to review and update your estate plan to ensure alignment with your long-term goals. For guidance on how the new law may affect your situation, contact a member of Varnum’s Estate Planning Practice Team.

Delaware Overhauls DBA Registration Process with HB 40

Delaware Overhauls DBA Registration Process with HB 40

Delaware recently enacted House Bill 40, which significantly restructures the registration process for “doing business as” (DBA) trade names in the state. The new law, which takes effect February 2, 2026, centralizes and streamlines DBA filings, introduces electronic registration, and imposes new requirements for both existing and new DBAs.

Businesses operating in or registering as a DBA in Delaware should begin preparing now to ensure continued compliance.

Centralized, Statewide Filing System

Previously, businesses were required to file DBA registrations in each of Delaware’s three counties. HB 40 eliminates this approach, replacing it with a centralized filing system administered by the Delaware Division of Revenue. This change is expected to simplify the process and reduce administrative burdens.

Electronic Filing and Elimination of Notarization

Under the new system, all DBA applications must be submitted electronically through the Division of Revenue’s online portal. The new law also eliminates the requirement for notarization, further streamlining the process.

Re-Registration Requirement for Existing DBAs

A critical aspect of HB 40 is the requirement that all existing DBAs in Delaware must re-register their trade names with the Division of Revenue. Failure to do so may result in the loss of rights to use the assumed name. Businesses should start preparing for this change ahead of the 2026 effective date.

Requirements for New DBA Registrations

Entities conducting business in Delaware must have an active Delaware business license to register for a DBA. Additionally, all trade names must be unique as duplicate or confusingly similar names will not be permitted.

Entities not conducting business in Delaware but wishing to register a DBA must obtain a special trade name license from the Division of Revenue. This license requires a $25 annual fee and must be renewed each year.

Next Steps for Businesses

  1. Review Existing DBAs: Identify all trade names currently registered in Delaware and prepare to re-register them electronically with the Division of Revenue before the February 2, 2026, deadline.
  2. Update Business Licenses: Ensure all licenses are active and in good standing before re-registration begins.
  3. Check Name Availability: Confirm that desired trade names are unique and meet the new standards.

If you have questions about how these changes may impact your business or need assistance navigating the new DBA registration process, contact your Varnum attorney or a member of our Corporate Practice Team.

2025 summer associate Benjamin Riley contributed to this advisory. Ben is currently a law student at Wake Forest University School of Law.

The Importance of Service Agreements

Mitigating Risk in TPA Agreements Under ERISA

Most employee benefit plans are administered by third-party administrators (TPAs) under the terms of signed service agreements. While the plan sponsor is generally the legal “plan administrator,” many administrative functions can be delegated to the TPA through these agreements. As benefit structures and related litigation grow more complex, the specific terms of service agreements have become increasingly important. Now is a good time to review potential risks.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) imposes fiduciary duties on plan sponsors that affect certain aspects of TPA service agreements. For example, agreements must be in writing, the fees charged must be reasonable considering the services provided, and those services must be necessary for plan administration.

Whether entering into a new agreement, renewing a TPA relationship, or reviewing existing terms, here are some key points to consider:

Who is the TPA, and what services do they provide?

It is essential to clearly define the scope of services and fees, including how fees are paid and to whom. This transparency helps plan administrators meet their fiduciary duties and improves efficiency by clarifying contacts and avoiding duplication when multiple service providers are involved.

What is in the indemnification and limitations of liability provisions?

Indemnification clauses protect both the plan sponsor and the service provider. Indemnification generally means one party agrees to cover certain losses or damages incurred by the other. Plan sponsors typically seek broad indemnification from the provider and minimal limits on the provider’s liability. Service providers often seek to limit liability, for instance, to 12 months of fees. These provisions should clearly define what is covered, what is excluded, and the limits (if any) on liability. Sponsors should also consider insurance or separate indemnification to protect against liability arising from a provider’s actions, especially where the provider has limited fiduciary obligations.  

What is the duration of the agreement, and how can it be terminated?

ERISA requires that agreements either have a defined term or include a termination clause allowing for reasonable notice.

What happens if the TPA makes an error?

Service agreements should address how errors are handled. It should clearly outline who is responsible for identifying and correcting mistakes, sending required notices, and covering any related costs. These obligations may intersect with indemnification terms.

Does the service agreement address data privacy and HIPAA compliance?

Benefit plans involve sensitive personal data. Service agreements should include strong provisions to ensure data protection and compliance with HIPAA and other applicable privacy standards. As with other fiduciary obligations, documentation is key.

Are agreements regularly reviewed?

Plan administrators have a fiduciary duty to monitor both their service providers and the activities performed under the agreements. It is best practice to review these relationships every two to three years. While not required, many sponsors use request-for-proposal (RFP) processes or detailed performance reviews to assess fees, service levels, and compliance with fiduciary duties.

Regular reviews of key relationships, including with recordkeepers, investment advisers, and welfare benefit administrators, can help ensure compliance, minimize risk and financial exposure, and improve the value of services received.

For assistance reviewing your service agreements, contact a member of Varnum’s Employee Benefits Team.

Understanding the Role of Insurance Agents Under Michigan Law

Understanding the Role of Insurance Agents Under Michigan Law

Many businesses and individuals consider their insurance agent a trusted advisor who will proactively ensure adequate coverage. But when an insurance claim is denied or doesn’t result in the expected payout, policyholders may be surprised to learn that Michigan law does not impose a general legal duty on insurance agents to advise clients on the adequacy or suitability of coverage.

In most situations, insurance agents are only responsible for securing the specific coverage requested by the client. They can be held liable for inadequate or inaccurate coverage recommendations only in limited and specific circumstances.

The General Rule: No Duty to Advise

Under longstanding Michigan law, insurance agents and brokers are generally considered facilitators of coverage, not legal or financial advisors. As outlined by the Michigan Supreme Court in Harts v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 461 Mich. 1 (1999), an agent’s primary legal obligation is to obtain the insurance coverage requested by the client. They are not required to assess whether the coverage is appropriate for the client’s situation or to suggest additional protections.

The Exception: Special Relationships

There are exceptions to this rule. A heightened legal duty may apply if a “special relationship” exists between the agent and the insured. Whether such a relationship has been established is typically a question of fact for a jury.

Michigan courts have identified several nonexclusive factors that may support the existence of a special relationship. In Harts, the court outlined that an agent’s duty may expand in situations such as:

  1. The agent misrepresents the nature or extent of the coverage offered or provided.
  2. An ambiguous request is made that requires clarification.
  3. An inquiry is made that may require advice, and the agent, though not obligated, gives inaccurate advice.
  4. The agent assumes an additional duty through express agreement or a specific promise to the insured.

When a special relationship is found, the agent has a duty to advise and may be held legally responsible for failing to fulfill that duty. See, for example, Zaremba Equipment, Inc. v. Harco National Insurance Co., 280 Mich. App. 16, 28 (2008). However, the burden falls on the insured to prove that such a relationship existed.

Practical Tips for Policyholders

Although most insurance agents strive to provide excellent service and guidance, it’s important for policyholders to understand the legal framework and take steps to protect themselves. Here are a few practical tips:

  1. Be specific. If you need assurance that your policy meets particular needs, ask your agent or broker directly and get confirmation in writing. The more specific your request, the more likely the agent’s response will carry legal significance.
  2. Keep good records. Document conversations and correspondence, especially when coverage recommendations or assessments are involved.
  3. Review your policy. Even if a special relationship exists, policyholders still have a duty to review and understand their policy. Courts have held that an unreasonable failure to read the policy can weaken or defeat a claim for negligent advice.

Ultimately, Michigan courts are reluctant to impose liability on insurance professionals beyond their traditional role. While many clients naturally view their agent as an advisor, the law may not always treat them that way.

To strengthen your position and ensure clarity in your insurance arrangements, be proactive: ask questions, get answers in writing, and review your policy carefully. These steps can help demonstrate that your agent acted in an advisory capacity, if needed.

For questions about how you may be impacted, contact your Varnum insurance attorney.

Tax Implications of H.R. 1

7 16 Advisory Taxhr1 1200x628

H.R. 1 (the Act), formerly known as or nicknamed the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”, was signed into law on July 4, 2025, and introduces significant tax reforms. It extends several expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), creates new legislation, and modifies several existing provisions of the U.S. tax code.

Extensions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)

    • Income Tax Rates: The TCJA personal income tax rates and brackets are now permanent. The seven (7) brackets are 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35%, and 37%.

    • Standard Deduction: The temporary TCJA standard deduction amounts ($15,750 for individual filers, $31,500 for joint filers, and $23,625 for heads of households) are made permanent.

    • Personal Exemption Repeal: The TCJA temporarily repealed the personal exemption deduction. The Act makes this repeal permanent.

    • Mortgage Interest Deduction: The TCJA mortgage interest deduction limit of $750,000 ($375,000 for single filers) is made permanent. Certain mortgage premiums may be eligible for a tax deduction. There is no longer a deduction for interest on home equity debt.

    • Personal Casualty and Theft Loss Deductions: The TCJA repeal of casualty and theft loss deductions is made permanent. An exception for federal disasters remains in place.

    • Miscellaneous Itemized Deductions: The TCJA rule of no miscellaneous itemized deductions is made permanent. Deductions subject to the previous 2% floor are permanently eliminated.

    • AMT Exemption: The TCJA’s alternative minimum tax (AMT) exemption and exemption amounts ($88,100 for single filers and $137,000 for joint filers) are permanently extended. Exemption amounts are indexed for inflation. The threshold for phaseout of the exemption is $500,000 for single filers and $1 million for joint filers, indexed for inflation. Phaseout is increased to 50% of the amount by which the taxpayer’s alternative minimum taxable income exceeds the phaseout threshold amount.

    • Charitable Deductions: The TCJA expands the tax deduction for charitable donations. Filers who do not itemize can claim a deduction up to $1,000 for single filers and $2,000 for joint filers for specific charitable donations. Filers who itemize are now subject to new carryover rules and a new limit on deductions. Those who itemize can deduct donations only to the extent they exceed 0.5% of the filer’s contribution base. Carryovers are only permitted if this 0.5% threshold is met. Additionally, the 60% contribution limit for cash gifts to qualified charities is made permanent.

    • Pease Limitations: Pease limitations are permanently eliminated.

    • Section 529 Accounts: Tax-free distributions from section 529 accounts may be used for expenses in connection with enrollment or attendance at an elementary or secondary school, including private schools and religious schools. Tax-free distributions may also be used for qualified higher education expenses.

    • Estate, Gift, and Generation-Skipping Transfer Taxes: The Act permanently increases the exemption amounts for these taxes to $15 million for single filers and $30 million for joint filers, indexed for inflation.

State and Local Tax (SALT) Deductions Increase

    • The SALT deduction cap temporarily increases to $40,000, with a 1% annual increase through 2029.

    • For individuals with a modified adjusted gross income over $500,000, a phase-down applies to the available deduction with a floor of $10,000. 

    • In 2030, the cap will permanently revert to $10,000 for all filers, regardless of income.

Changes to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)

    • Several IRA green energy tax credits and individual clean energy credits are repealed.

Tax Reform for Individuals

    • Child Tax Credit: The Child Tax Credit is made permanent. The credit increases to $2,200, subject to a phaseout. The phaseout begins at an income of $200,000 for single filers and $400,000 for joint filers. To qualify for the Child Tax Credit, the child and at least one parent must have a valid Social Security Number.

    • Additional Deduction for Seniors: Seniors are eligible to claim a deduction of $6,000, subject to a phaseout (beginning at an income of $75,000 for single filers and $150,000 for joint filers). The deduction is completely phased out at an income of $175,000 for single filers and $350,000 for joint filers.  This added deduction is set to expire in 2028.  

    • No Tax on Tips: Income from tips is temporarily deductible. The deduction is capped at $25,000 of reported tips and is subject to a phaseout. Tips are still reportable and taxable at the state and local level. This deduction is set to expire after 2028.

    • No Tax on Overtime: Income earned from overtime pay is temporarily deductible. This new law applies to qualified overtime pay of $12,500 for single filers and $25,000 for joint filers. This deduction is subject to a phaseout for individuals with incomes exceeding $150,000 who file singly and $300,000 for those filing jointly. This provision is set to expire after 2028.

    • Deductible Car Loan Interest: For cars assembled in the United States, auto loan interest is deductible through 2028 and is capped at $10,000. The deduction is also subject to phaseouts for single filers with income above $100,000 and joint filers with income above $200,000.

    • Trump Accounts: The Act establishes a tax-favored account to benefit children under the age of eighteen. Parents can contribute up to $5,000 per year to the account, adjusted for inflation, and the money may be withdrawn once the beneficiary turns 18. The funds can be used to pay for college, a first-time home purchase, or to start a business. Account withdrawals are taxed at favorable capital gains rates. There are no income limits or applicable phaseouts. 

Tax Reform for Businesses

    • Qualified Business Income (Sec 199A) Deduction: The Act makes permanent the 20% deduction of qualified business income (QBI) for qualifying business owners of pass-through entities. The deduction limit phase-in is $75,000 for single filers and $150,000 for joint filers. The Act also adds a minimum $400 deduction, indexed for inflation, for taxpayers with $1,000 or more of QBI. 

    • Qualified Small Business Stock (Section 1202) Exclusion: For qualified small business stock issued after July 4, 2025, the exclusion limitation under section 1202 is now $15 million, indexed for inflation. The following tiered system applies to qualified small business stock issued after July 4, 2025:
      • 50% for stock held for at least 3 years
      • 75% for stock held for at least 4 years

        • 100% for stock held for at least 5 years

    • Research and Development (R&D): For domestic R&D expenses, taxpayers may elect to immediately deduct R&D costs in the year incurred or capitalize and amortize costs over the useful life of the research. The Act also allows small businesses and startups to receive refundable credits for R&D.

    • Employee Retention Credit (ERC): The IRS can no longer issue refunds for unpaid claims filed after January 31, 2024. The statute of limitations for ERC claims made with respect to the third and fourth quarters of 2021 is extended to six years. The Act also implements additional penalties for ERC mill promoters.

    • Section 179 Expensing Provision: The section 179 expensing provision cap is now $2.5 million, indexed for inflation. It is subject to a phaseout beginning at $4 million.

    • Additional Changes:
      • The excess business loss limitation is now permanent. Depreciation, amortization, and depletion deductions are removed from the adjusted taxable income (ATI) calculation. The 100% bonus depreciation provisions of the TCJA are now permanent. The Qualified Opportunity Zone (QOZ) program is now permanent with some modifications. The low-income housing credit and its eligibility requirements have been reformed, expanding the number of issuable tax credits. The New Markets Tax Credit is permanently extended.

        • 25% of interest income from qualified loans secured by rural or agricultural real property is excluded from gross income.

Tax Reforms for Tax-Exempt Organizations

    • Executive Compensation Excise Tax: The excise tax under section 4960 now applies to all earners of a nonprofit receiving over $1 million in compensation.

    • Excise Tax on Investment Income of Private Colleges and Universities: The Act creates a tiered tax system based on an institution’s “student-adjusted endowment.” The tiered system applies to private institutions that have at least 3,000 tuition-paying students and a student-adjusted endowment of at least $500,000. The rates for applicable institutions are as follows:
      • 1.4% for endowments of at least $500,000 but less than $750,000
      • 4% for endowments of at least $750,000 but less than $2 million

        • 8% for endowments of at least $2 million

Tax Reform for International Tax

    • GILTI Deduction: The Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) deduction is made permanent, providing a tax break for offshore profits. This deduction has been renamed as the Net CFC Tested Income (NCTI) deduction. The NCTI deduction percentage is set at 40%. Deductions allocated to NCTI only include the section 250 deduction and directly allocable deductions.

    • FDII: The Foreign-derived Intangible Income (FDII) deduction is reduced to 33.34%. The FDII deduction has also been renamed as the Foreign-Derived Deductible Eligible Income (FDDEI) deduction.

    • QBAI: The Qualified Business Asset Investment (QBAI) is eliminated for purposes of determining deductions for GILTI and FDII. 

    • BEAT: Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT) is permanently increased from 10% to 10.5%.

    • Foreign Tax Credits: The Act increases the deemed paid foreign tax credits (FTC) on net CFC-tested income to 90% and disallows FTC on 10% of associated foreign taxes.

    • Section 163(j): The Act permanently reinstates EBITDA as part of the calculation for modified adjusted taxable income (ATI) for business interest limitation. Several international inclusions have been removed from the ATI calculation.

    • Section 954(c)(6): The section 954(c)(6) look-through rule for CFCs is permanently extended.

    • Additional Changes:
      • The Act eliminates the option for a one-month deferral year for a specified foreign corporation. The Act restores section 958(b)(4) and creates a new section 951B for foreign-controlled U.S. shareholders and foreign-controlled foreign corporations.

        • The Act modifies the pro rata share rules to require any U.S. shareholder who owns stock during any part of the CFC year to include their pro rata share of subpart F income.

For questions about how these changes may impact you or your business, contact Varnum’s Tax Compliance, Planning, and Litigation Team.

For information on how the Act affects clean energy tax credits, read our advisory: How New Tax Legislation Impacts Clean Energy Tax Credits.

2025 summer associate Isadora Dimovski contributed to this advisory. Isadora is currently a law student at the University of Michigan.

Florida CHOICE Act Overhauls Non-Compete Laws for Employers

Florida CHOICE Act Overhauls Non-Compete Laws for Employers

The Florida Contracts Honoring Opportunity, Investment, Confidentiality, and Economic Growth (CHOICE) Act makes sweeping changes to how restrictive covenants, such as non-compete agreements, are handled in the state. While many states are tightening restrictions on these agreements, Florida is moving in the opposite direction. Effective July 1, 2025, the CHOICE Act increases employers’ ability to enforce non-compete agreements and introduces new legal tools to protect businesses.

What Does the CHOICE Act Do?

The CHOICE Act strengthens the protections afforded to employers and their ability to enforce restrictive covenant agreements. Currently, non-compete agreements are governed by Florida Statute § 542.335, which requires employers to prove:

  • The existence of a written agreement signed by the employee;
  • A legitimate business reason that is necessary to protect the employer; and
  • Reasonable limitations on the time (typically 2 years), geographic scope, and scope of business restrictions contained within the agreement.

The Act expands these provisions and instead places the burden on the employee to show the agreement is unenforceable. Under the Act, covered garden leave agreements and covered non-compete agreements are presumed to be enforceable, and courts must issue a preliminary injunction to enjoin a covered employee from violating a restrictive covenant.

Who is Covered by the CHOICE Act?

The CHOICE Act applies to both “covered employees” and “covered employers.”

  • Covered Employees: Includes employees or independent contractors who earn more than twice the average wage in the county where they live or where the employer’s principal office is located. In most Florida counties, this means a salary range of approximately $90,000 to $170,000.

Health care practitioners are excluded from the CHOICE Act. Any new non-compete agreements involving health care practitioners will continue to fall under Florida’s existing restrictive covenant statute.

  • Covered Employers: Include any entity or individual that employs a covered employee. The employer does not need to be located in Florida to be covered under the Act. If an out of state employer enters a restrictive agreement with a Florida-based employee, the CHOICE Act will apply. Likewise, if an employee lives outside of Florida, but the employer’s principal office is in Florida, the Act will govern the agreement.

Garden Leave Agreements

Garden leave agreements allow employers to require advance notice of resignation, during which the employee remains on payroll but may not work elsewhere.

Under the CHOICE Act, employers may:

  • Require up to four years of advance notice before termination
  • Keep the employee on payroll during that period, limited to base salary
  • Require the employee to work for only the first 90 days of the notice period
  • Allow the employee to stop working and engage in non-work activities after the 90-day period

To be enforceable, garden leave agreements must meet the following criteria:

  1. The agreement must inform the employee in writing of the right to seek legal counsel, and provide at least 7 days to review it
  2. The employee must acknowledge in writing that they may receive confidential client information during their employment
  3. The agreement must explain that the employee is only required to work for the first 90 days and may pursue non-work activities after that time
  4. The agreement must state that the employee may not begin working elsewhere without the employer’s written permission

Employers may shorten the notice period to 30 days’ written notice. In cases of gross misconduct, employers may reduce the employee’s salary without breaching the agreement.

Non-Compete Agreements

The CHOICE Act expands the scope and enforceability of non-compete agreements in Florida.

Key changes include:

  • Non-compete periods may now last up to four years
  • Agreements are not required to include geographic limitations
  • Employers are no longer required to prove restrictions are reasonable in time, geography, or business scope

To be enforceable, a non-compete agreement must:

  1. Inform the employee in writing of the right to seek legal counsel, and allow at least 7 days for review
  2. Include a written acknowledgment from the employee that they may access confidential client information
  3. Limit the non-compete period to no more than four years
  4. Reduce the non-compete period day-by-day for any portion of a concurrent garden leave period during which the employee is not working.

How Will the CHOICE Act Be Enforced?

If a dispute arises, Florida courts are required to issue a preliminary injunction against a covered employee automatically. After the injunction is issued, courts may only modify or dissolve the injunction if the covered employee or new employer can prove by clear and convincing evidence that either:

  1. The covered employee will not perform similar work during the restricted period;
  2. The employee will not use confidential information or customer relationships within their new employment;
  3. The covered employer failed to pay the required consideration under the restrictive agreement (after a cure period of at least 30 days); or
  4. The subsequent employer is not engaged in, or preparing to engage in, a similar business within the restricted geographic area.

The “clear and convincing” standard is a challenging burden for a plaintiff to meet in civil litigation. Terms such as “similar work” and “similar business” are not defined in the Act, which may lead to uncertainty in how courts apply them. The prevailing party in any dispute is entitled to recover reasonable litigation costs from the losing party.

Considerations for Employers

The CHOICE Act offers new protections for employers who may want to incorporate the new non-compete structure into their contracts. Although employers may continue using the existing Florida statute, the new law may provide strategic advantages. Employers should consider reviewing current agreements and evaluating whether to adopt new language that complies with and benefits from the CHOICE Act’s provisions.

For questions about how these changes may impact your business or to ensure your business is fully compliant with the CHOICE Act, contact Varnum’s Litigation Practice Team.

2025 summer associate Nolan Thomas contributed to this advisory. Nolan is currently a law student at the University of Miami.

Title IX Challenge Delays $2.8B College Athlete NIL Settlement

Title IX Challenge Delays $2.8B College Athlete NIL Settlement

The recent settlement of In re College Athlete NIL Litigation (the Settlement) has been challenged on Title IX grounds. The Settlement mandated back payments of $2.8 billion to former Division I athletes who played college sports before Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) compensation was allowed in 2021.

Why Are the NIL Settlement Payments Delayed?

A group of female athletes filed a Title IX challenge, arguing that the distribution of the $2.8 billion, 90% to men’s football and basketball players, 5% to women’s basketball players, and 5% to all other student athletes, violates Title IX’s gender equity requirements.

Which Parts of the Settlement Will Still Take Effect in 2025?

Key components of the settlement, including revenue sharing, a new NIL framework, and revised roster limits, are still scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2025. Only the $2.8 billion in back payments is paused.

What Is the NIL Clearinghouse and What Role Does Deloitte Play?

The NIL clearinghouse is a third-party administrator of the College Sports Commission tasked with reviewing NIL agreements for compliance with the new rules regarding NIL. It will review NIL agreements involving third parties affiliated with schools, such as boosters and collectives. Deloitte will operate the clearinghouse through its NIL Go platform, which will evaluate whether athlete compensation in certain deals meets or exceeds fair market value.

Which NIL Agreements Will the Clearinghouse Review?

The clearinghouse will review NIL agreements exceeding $600 that involve “associated entities,” such as school-affiliated boosters and collectives. Athletes must disclose all agreements over $600, but only those involving associated entities are subject to fair market value review.

How Are “Associated Entities” Determined?

Entities or individuals are considered associated if they were created to support a school’s athletics program, have donated more than $50,000 to the school or such entities, or have been directed by the school to assist in recruiting or retaining athletes.

What is a “Legitimate Business Purpose” for NIL Deals?

To pass review, agreements must serve a legitimate business purpose, such as promoting goods or services to the public. Deals lacking a clear business rationale will not pass the fair market value review.

Has the NCAA Provided NIL Guidance?

In December 2024, the NCAA issued internal Q&A memos to guide schools on evaluating NIL deals; however, this guidance has not been made publicly available.

How Will the Clearinghouse Evaluate Fair Market Value?

Deloitte is expected to utilize a database of past NIL deals and consider factors such as athlete performance, social media presence, and brand influence to determine whether the compensation under a given NIL agreement falls within the fair market value. The full methodology has not been publicly disclosed.

What Happens If an NIL Agreement Is Not Cleared?

If a deal is not cleared, athletes may renegotiate, decline the deal, or proceed at the risk of losing eligibility, as determined by the College Sports Commission. Athletes can also request neutral arbitration to resolve disputes.

The regulatory landscape of college athletics continues to evolve rapidly. Interested parties should contact Varnum’s NIL Practice Team to ensure compliance with NCAA, state, and institutional regulations.

Does HIPAA Apply To My Business?

Does HIPAA Apply to My Business?

Varnum Viewpoints:

HIPAA applies outside of healthcare providers. If you offer employee health benefits, especially through a self-funded plan, HIPAA applies to your health plan.

You may be a covered entity or business associate. Health plans, providers, and vendors handling health data are subject to HIPAA, often to differing extents.

HIPAA has specific compliance duties. Requirements include privacy notices, policies, risk assessments, and business associate agreements.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) applies far more often than many realize, including when a company outside of the healthcare sector provides certain types of health benefits to its own employees. While HIPAA compliance quickly gets complex, determining if it applies to your business does not need to be. This advisory includes helpful definitions of key terms, including Protected Health Information (PHI), the Privacy Rule, and the Security Rule.

What Is a HIPAA Covered Entity?

HIPAA applies only to covered entities, including health care providers and health plans, and their business associates. Many covered entities already know they are subject to HIPAA. This includes those in the healthcare sector, such as doctors, hospitals, pharmacies, and insurance companies, for whom HIPAA compliance should be an integral part of daily business.

Does My Employee Health Plan Make My Company a Covered Entity?

Employer-sponsored health plans are also covered entities. The design of that health plan will impact how HIPAA applies, but the Privacy Rule and the Security Rule make it clear: if employees receive health benefits, HIPAA will apply to the health plan, even if it does not apply to the company in its role as an employer generally. If an employer maintains a fully-insured plan and the insurer is handling most or all of the administration of the coverage, the employer may not receive much PHI, if any. However, as more plans move toward self-funding and self-administration, HIPAA will apply to more functions carried out by the employer.

Who Is a HIPAA Business Associate?

A business associate is any entity that creates, receives, or transmits PHI in relation to a covered entity. Business associates are subject to the same HIPAA compliance rules as covered entities, and the same penalties apply for violation of these rules. In addition, covered entities and their business associates must enter into “business associate agreements” which explicitly require the business associate to comply with HIPAA and may set forth other terms such as notification and indemnification provisions.

As with covered entities in the healthcare sector, most business associates will know that their work is subjecting their business to HIPAA. However, any business that provides products and services that are or could be used to provide healthcare should carefully assess whether and to what extent HIPAA applies to their business. For example, SAAS providers and app developers may have access to PHI, making them a business associate that must comply with HIPAA. Some covered entities will push their vendors to enter into business associate agreements, even if it does not directly apply.

What Is PHI?

Protected health information is any individually identifiable health information that is created, received, stored, or transmitted by a covered entity, an entity subject to HIPAA, such as a health care provider, insurance company, or employer health plan, or their business associates, those entities who access PHI on behalf of the covered entity.

What Is the HIPAA Privacy Rule?

The Privacy Rule is the part of HIPAA that protects PHI through limiting who can access it, how it is used, and providing individuals with rights relating to their PHI.

What Is the HIPAA Security Rule?

The Security Rule is the part of HIPAA that covers how electronic creation, storage, use, and disclosure of PHI must be done to ensure the privacy of PHI.

What Are My HIPAA Compliance Requirements?

When HIPAA applies, the entity is expected to comply with HIPAA’s broad range of requirements. Key compliance requirements include providing a notice of privacy practices, naming a compliance officer responsible for complying with HIPAA, establishing policies and procedures, conducting a risk assessment, and entering into necessary agreements, such as business associate agreements. See our detailed explanation, HIPAA and Employee Benefits: The Basics of Compliance.

If you have questions or concerns, contact a member of our Privacy or Employee Benefits Practice Teams.