Skip to content

Litigation and ADR

Our trial lawyers have the skill and experience to provide clients with effective, high-quality, cost-conscious representation

Comprised of more than 50 attorneys across Michigan, with recognition from the likes of Chambers & Partners, The American Lawyer and U.S. News and World Report’s Best Lawyers, our team is routinely engaged in high-stakes disputes, spanning patent infringement, trade secrets, software licensing agreements, complex commercial disputes, and other matters of first impression.

In recognition of our prowess, Varnum is one of two firms in Michigan named to Law360’s inaugural listing of Regional Powerhouses.

Commercial lawsuits make up a large part of our litigation practice. We handle cases involving contract disputes, environmental claims, securitiesantitrust, construction, corporate takeoversproduct liability and real estate issues. We also represent clients in personal injury cases; patent, trademark and copyright suitsarbitration; tax proceedingslabor and employment mattersERISA casesbankruptcy proceedings; and a range of administrative tribunal work.

Our trial attorneys regularly appear in state, federal trial and appellate courts throughout the United States.

Illustrative Experience

$105 Million Verdict Against Ford Motor Company
Representation of Versata Software, Inc. in a trade secret infringement case against Ford Motor Company. The case was complex and involved highly technical evidence regarding software. After three weeks of trial, the jury found that Ford had breached its contract with Versata and misappropriated the trade secrets in Versata’s proprietary configuration software, awarding
Versata $105 million.

$300+ Million Recovered Against Large Insurer
Representation of more than 200 companies with respect to Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan’s ERISA violations in so-called “Hidden Fee” litigation. The first such trial resulted in a $6 million judgment, and subsequent judgments ranged from $315,000 to more than $8 million, with total claims exceeding $300 million. Varnum defended the primary judgment on appeal, where it was unanimously affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and certiorari denied by the U.S. Supreme Court.

270+ Lawsuits Involving “Forever Chemicals” Settled
In the largest environmental tort case in Kent County, Michigan, history, Varnum represented more than 400 Rockford area residents in 270+ separate lawsuits against shoe-maker Wolverine Worldwide and the multi-national chemical manufacturer 3M. The litigation raised issues of first impression relating to decades old dumping of toxic PFAS chemicals, which contaminated drinking water for thousands of area residents. Claims alleged exposure-related illnesses, including multiple cancers and property value loss.

Jury Returns $0 Award in $23 Million Intellectual Property Dispute
Representation of defendant Computer Methods Corporation in a case involving the joint venture development of high-tech tire tag technology between the parties. The trial was in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Bridgestone/Firestone, represented by Jones Day, sued for $23 million and was awarded nothing by the jury in its verdict. The jury granted Computer Methods Corporation over $600,000 of a $700,000 Counterclaim against Bridgestone.

Stolen Van Gogh Artwork Recovered
Representation of Brokerate Capital in a dispute that spurred international intrigue in the art world involving an 1888 painting by Vincent Van Gogh. Brokerarte had acquired the painting “The Novel Reader” in 2017 for $3.7 million and gave temporary possession to a third party, who absconded with it. The stolen painting had been missing for nearly six years when it was discovered in 2023 at the Detroit Institute of Art exhibit “Van Gogh in America.” Varnum filed suit on behalf of the client, demanding that the piece be returned to Brokerarte and not to the unnamed party who lent it to the museum. We successfully settled the matter and returned the painting to its rightful owner.

Dismissal of “Flint Water Crisis” Charges
Representation of a former government official in the highest profile litigation in recent Michigan history, the Flint Water Crisis. We successfully defended the former Director of Health and Human Services throughout the prosecution process, including development of the strategy that led to the dismissal of charges against our client, the former Governor of Michigan and other government officials. Our team’s work was recognized by The American Lawyer’s Litigation Daily.

Successful Resolution of DOJ Antitrust Charges and Civil Claims
Representation of a leading Belgian auto supplier in the Department of Justice’s “Auto Parts” investigation and follow-on class actions. After we successfully secured a full declination of criminal charges, despite the fact that a competitor supplier identified our client as an alleged coconspirator, we led the company’s defense of class action litigation brought in the U.S. and Canada. Our aggressive advocacy enabled us to resolve the case for less than $250,000—an impressive result considering other similarly situated defendants settled for as much as $32 million, excluding legal fees that amounted to millions.

Global Medical Device Leader Wins Jury Verdict in the Eastern District of Texas
Representation of the global leader in arthroscopic surgery, Arthrex Inc., in a patent infringement case in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. After a fast-tracked 18 months of intense discovery, and a week-long trial, the jury found the patents at issue valid and the defendants to have willfully infringed every claim of the patents at issue.

$30 Million Lawsuit Settled for Pennies on the Dollar
Representation of TSC, a public company, in a lawsuit filed by Ford Motor Company claiming that the operational speeds in a complex software package were deficient. Ford asked for over $30 million in damages from TSC initially and demanded a verdict of $14 million at trial. The case was mediated for $6 million against TSC. After a 10-day trial, a jury awarded $3.1 million to Ford, but the case was settled for substantially less prior to appeal.

Jet Engineers Prevail in Complex, Multi-Jurisdictional Fraud and Trade Secret Action
Representation of a team of American and German entrepreneurs and engineers and their business venture, a jet engine supplier, in fraud and trade secret actions brought in the United States District Courts for the Northern District of Illinois, Southern District of New York, and before the American Arbitration Association. Our client was granted a complete dismissal of all federal cases and an arbitration award of no cause of action for alleged misappropriation and all other claims, following significant motion practice in the federal cases and a full arbitration hearing. The arbitrator further awarded in excess of $300,000 in legal fees to the clients and against the plaintiffs.

Trade Secrets Validated Following Jury Trial
Representation of a gourmet foods company in a misappropriation of trade secret and unfair competition case against two former employees who stole a trade secret recipe/formula for the client’s product, then formed a new company to manufacture and sell their “knock-off” version. After a week-long trial in state court, the jury found the defendants liable for misappropriation and awarded all sought damages. In addition, we secured a permanent injunction preventing defendants from manufacturing their “knock-off” product.

Four-Week Jury Trial Culminates in Successful Claims of Patent Infringement
Representation of plaintiff Teleflex, a publicly traded multinational client, in its claim of patent infringement. The federal jury awarded Teleflex a large monetary verdict and the Judge issued a permanent injunction against defendant, a Spanish company that had been competing with Teleflex.

Multi-Jurisdictional Patent Dispute Settles on Favorable Terms
Representation of Arthrex in a dispute that was tried twice in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. In the first trial, the jury was hung 7-1 in favor of the defendant. In the second trial, Smith & Nephew obtained a verdict that was reversed on a successful appeal to the Federal Circuit. Following additional appeals at the Patent and Trademark Office and the Federal Circuit, a favorable settlement was achieved.

Zealous Advocacy in Patent Infringement Dispute Results in De Minimis Settlement
Representation of GFI, a manufacturer of alternative fuel systems, in a patent infringement dispute. Although the plaintiff IMPCO, a leading alternative fuel systems manufacturer headquartered in California, had a strong patent infringement case against GFI, we were able to raise substantial questions as to the validity of IMPCO’s patent. As a result, IMPCO decided to settle the case by dismissing its lawsuit against GFI.

Trade Secret Suit Dismissed
Representation of a national grocery chain in connection with its trade secret dispute with Tampa, Fla.-based software company Mad Mobile Inc. Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Mad Mobile’s suit claimed the grocer stole and continued to use its proprietary technology, despite previously severing its contract agreement with the company. The court dismissed the case, ruling in favor of our client’s motion to compel arbitration to resolve the dispute.

Our Approach

Our approach to every case is straightforward:

  • Analyze the case and develop options.
  • Strive for superior results.
  • Keep clients informed and involved throughout the proceedings.
  • Give primary responsibility to a trial law partner.
  • Use associates and paralegals to provide efficiency.
  • Make smart use of technology.
  • Call on attorneys from other Varnum practice areas – corporateenvironmentallabortax – to strengthen a case or suggest innovative ways to resolve a dispute.

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Varnum resolution facilitators have the experience, training and certification to be qualified mediators and arbitrators. We are active participants in the resolution process and guide disputing parties through discussions and brainstorming sessions to help them find the best results. We challenge parties to look beyond their own positions on the disputed issues and toward their individual desired outcomes. Where those outcomes meet, there is room for successful negotiation and compromise. Varnum resolution facilitators are veteran attorneys with years of experience in various areas of law, primarily for corporate clients. Several Varnum attorneys are certified mediators and others are available to act as arbitrators. They all bring a high level of understanding of business disputes and a wealth of  resources about applicable laws and legal precedent.

Over the years, our resolution facilitators have handled mediations, appeared on arbitration panels and acted as sole arbitrators for disputes across the country. They have coached numerous clients through the mediation process and have seen from all sides what makes mediation successful or unsuccessful. Each neutral has a different way of approaching the mediation process while retaining the basic theories of successful negotiation. Varnum’s dispute resolution offers you, your clients, your company and your employees access to thoughtful, confidential, expedient, fair and cost-effective alternatives to litigation.

Arbitration

What is arbitration?

Arbitration is a process in which a third party, called an arbitrator or neutral (or an arbitration panel), renders a binding decision based on the merits of each case as presented. The arbitrator, or arbitration panel, acts as a judge to serve a verdict that normally cannot be appealed.

Prior to arbitration, parties usually have some input on the designing of the process. For example, parties may decide to limit opening statements or forego discovery. It is important that the rules of arbitration are well thought out or many of the cost advantages of arbitration can be lost. Once the ground rules are established, the arbitrator takes control of the proceedings. The arbitration process is not public, so the proceedings can be completely confidential.

Why should I use arbitration?

There are several aspects that make arbitration a process preferable to litigation. Arbitration results in a binding decision without the time, expense and publicity that can accompany litigation. Arbitration can be a very efficient process compared to traditional litigation. This makes it less costly and leads to quicker resolutions rather than lawsuits that can continue for years.

What is the value of an experienced arbitrator?

Disputing parties select their own arbitrator, allowing them to choose someone with a relevant body of knowledge. For example, an attorney with experience in construction law would have a high level of understanding in a dispute over construction contracts. This previous knowledge means the arbitrator can spend less time learning about the basics of a situation and more time understanding the dispute.

What happens behind closed doors?

Because arbitration is essentially a private meeting, it retains a high amount of confidentiality. The public and media are not entitled to attend arbitrations and, in fact, rarely know that they are scheduled to occur. Arbitration decisions and proceedings are not public information.

When should I use arbitration?

Arbitration can be used to effectively resolve disputes in a variety of situations including: business-to-business, business-to-consumer and employer-to-employee. Arbitration works best in situations where otherwise a trial is the likely result. Like litigation, arbitration ends in a ‘win/lose’ situation, but in a more manageable, flexible way.

Facilitative Mediation

Whether you are an attorney talking with your client or corporation about entering into alternate dispute resolution (ADR), an administrator looking to create a mediation clause, or someone involved in a current dispute, the following information will help you understand and discuss the benefits of facilitative mediation.

What is facilitative mediation?

Facilitative mediation is a non-binding process in which a third party, called a mediator or neutral, facilitates the negotiation process between two or more parties. The mediator works with the disputants to establish ground rules and helps maintain those ground rules throughout the process. The mediator may work with each side individually to uncover issues and potential opportunities for consensus. Individuals maintain control over the outcome and are personally involved in the result. Mediation agreements are enforced as contracts.

Mediation is more confidential than a public court proceeding. Varnum mediators are required to maintain confidentiality and, by contract, cannot be called to testify about any statement made by either party during the mediation process.

Why should I use mediation?

The process of litigation is a pricey one. Beyond the cost of quality attorney representation and trial preparation, litigation often costs opposing parties their business and personal relationships and even their public reputation. Mediation costs little compared to litigation. It preserves relationships, finds mutually acceptable solutions, offers confidentiality and allows for flexibility and creativity in the dispute resolution process.

What is the value of an experienced mediator?

Since you choose your mediator, it is possible to select a neutral with special knowledge in an area. This limits the amount of background education required for the mediator to effectively facilitate discussions. For example, an environmental attorney understands the laws, processes and business decisions surrounding the sale of contaminated land and can offer insightful, cooperative options beyond what the parties may have discussed.

How does a less formal setting promote communication?

Sometimes the impetus for litigation is a plaintiff’s wanting their “day in court.” Facilitative mediation provides the opportunity for both parties to present their sides of the dispute in a less intimidating environment. Facilitative mediation can provide an open atmosphere for individuals to talk face-to-face about how an incident or the dispute has affected them individually, professionally and personally. Open communication often leads to an understanding of another party’s actions and ultimately preserves relationships. Mediation is not about attorneys winning cases for clients or juries deciding on financial compensation, it is about parties working through differences and miscommunication toward a common goal.

Personal Injury

At Varnum, our primary focus is to get you well – physically, emotionally and financially. As your advisors, we counsel you throughout the legal process while providing effective, experienced representation and the resources of one of the largest law firms in Michigan.

We help obtain healing, fair compensation and a just resolution for traumatically injured people by passionately believing in their causes and standing with courage on that belief.

What Makes Us Different

Helping a traumatically injured person requires more than generalized legal knowledge. Along with a focus in personal injury law, our attorneys have also acquired extensive medical knowledge. We have an in-depth understanding of how the body functions and how that function is altered by injury.

We also have a thorough understanding of medical concepts and terminology, which is essential in order to effectively explain to juries the relationship of physical trauma to a patient’s life and entire sense of well-being.

Free Consultation

Varnum attorneys are called upon in some of the most difficult times in people’s lives, when the future is uncertain and the concerns are many. We understand that you have questions and are happy to talk to you at no cost.

We accept cases on a contingency basis, meaning we receive a percentage of the money we recover for you. If we are not successful, you will owe us nothing for the time we have invested in your case.

Qualified Attorneys

Varnum’s Personal Injury Team is made up of nationally respected attorneys who genuinely care about helping you through one of the most difficult challenges you may ever face.

All of Varnum’s senior personal injury attorneys are rated AV® Preeminent – the highest rating possible – by Martindale-Hubbell, the nationally renowned lawyer grading system. Varnum’s personal injury group is recognized by U.S. News & World Report – Best Lawyers®, and all of our senior attorneys are listed in Best Lawyers in America®.

Power of a Law Firm

When you retain a Varnum attorney, you have access to the full resources of the firm. If your matter requires establishing a trust, or you must deal with probate or Social Security issues, our attorneys experienced in those areas are ready to help.

What to Expect

Varnum attorneys investigate and research each case thoroughly. Comprehensive materials are meticulously prepared, outlining the legal liability of the defendant and the substantive damages suffered by our client. We clearly explain your options, such as if the case can be settled more quickly out of court or whether litigation and a jury verdict may be required.

Many lawyers forget that they work for the client. We pride ourselves on keeping our clients fully informed, returning phone calls and responding promptly. At least two attorneys are committed to each client we represent, and our entire practice team is actively involved when needed during the trial.

Riparian Rights

If you own land that touches or is bounded by a natural body of water, you are entitled to riparian rights. This very specialized aspect of real estate law presents unique challenges which require the assistance of counsel experienced in handling such matters.

Our riparian rights team includes attorneys with experience in cottage lawenvironmentalland use and zoning law, which allow us to draw from a range of perspectives in resolving riparian rights and related matters.

Experience

We have experience solving the following problems:

  • Access rights
  • Dock disputes
  • Inland lake level proceedings
  • Plat vacations and similar issues involving dedicated areas in recorded plats
  • Road-end disputes
  • Boundary disputes, involving both uplands and riparian bottomlands
  • Municipal regulations of riparian uses
  • Restrictive covenants and deed restrictions
  • Issues concerning public access or other public rights
  • Hunting and fishing rights
  • Document review prior to property purchase
  • Easements
  • Litigation of riparian rights issues
  • Quiet title actions
  • Land use issues
Riparian Rights Disputes

Our experience has shown that far too many cases wind up in the courts because property owners have taken matters into their own hands without understanding their legal rights or the potential rights of the perceived transgressor. Seek legal advice before you resort to any “self-help” remedies.

Adjacent owners have been known to remove or destroy docks, tear down fences or erect obstructions to prevent access. In addition to the potential for hostility, such actions increase the likelihood of an expensive lawsuit, which may have been avoided if legal advice was sought in the first instance. If someone is using a portion of your land or interfering with the use and enjoyment of your property, seek appropriate counsel to understand your rights and how to protect them.

Uniform Commercial Code

Varnum attorneys serve our business clients’ needs in complex transactions governed by the Uniform Commercial Code. Although we have broad experience in all aspects of the UCC, our work tends to focus primarily on Article 2 (Sales of Goods) and Article 9 (Secure Transactions).

As to Article 2, we have experience in all facets of commercial sales, including drafting of purchase orders, quotes and acknowledgments to protect the rights of buyers and sellers respectively. We also have an extensive practice in the secure transactions area governed by Article 9.

Commercial and UCC Litigation

The lawyers in the commercial section of the trial team at Varnum have litigated a broad spectrum of commercial disputes. The firm has a high degree of specialized knowledge and experience in all of the traditional areas of commercial litigation, as well as in many unique areas of commercial law. Examples include:

  • Breach of warranty cases between commercial parties, including cases involving automotive parts suppliers at all levels (from the Big Three to Tier 1 and below), top-tier furniture manufacturers and hundreds of other companies
  • Commercial contract litigation matters (including sales-of-goods cases) involving issues such as contract formation, the enforceability of “output” and “requirements” obligations, “just-in-time” components and nearly every other issue that can arise under the Uniform Commercial Code sections governing sales
  • Adversary proceedings in bankruptcy, including preference cases, non-dischargeability cases and cases involving fraudulent conveyances
  • Banking litigation, including the rights and remedies of parties to routine bank transactions (forged endorsement cases), Equal Credit Opportunity Act cases (the enforceability of “spousal” guaranties), litigation over letters of credit and debtor/creditor rights
  • Commercial lease litigation under Article 2A of the Uniform Commercial Code

“Varnum is our go-to law firm in Michigan for all litigation matters. They are extremely professional and efficient. I would highly recommend this firm for large-scale litigation matters.”

Senior Counsel of Litigation, pulp and paper company

Sign up to be the first to access our leading legal insights.

The link you have selected will redirect you to a third-party website located on another server. We are offering the link for your convenience. Varnum has no responsibility for any external websites and makes no express or implied warranties about any external websites.

Please be aware that contacting us via e-mail does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and the firm. Do not send confidential information to the firm until you have spoken with one of our attorneys and receive authorization to send such materials.