Comprised of more than 50 attorneys across Michigan, with recognition from the likes of Chambers & Partners, The American Lawyer and U.S. News and World Report’s Best Lawyers, our team is routinely engaged in high-stakes disputes, spanning patent infringement, trade secrets, software licensing agreements, complex commercial disputes, and other matters of first impression.
In recognition of our prowess, Varnum is one of two firms in Michigan named to Law360’s inaugural listing of Regional Powerhouses.
Commercial lawsuits make up a large part of our litigation practice. We handle cases involving contract disputes, environmental claims, securities, antitrust, construction, corporate takeovers, product liability and real estate issues. We also represent clients in personal injury cases; patent, trademark and copyright suits; arbitration; tax proceedings; labor and employment matters; ERISA cases; bankruptcy proceedings; and a range of administrative tribunal work.
Our trial attorneys regularly appear in state, federal trial and appellate courts throughout the United States.
Illustrative Experience
$105 Million Verdict Against Ford Motor Company
Representation of Versata Software, Inc. in a trade secret infringement case against Ford Motor Company. The case was complex and involved highly technical evidence regarding software. After three weeks of trial, the jury found that Ford had breached its contract with Versata and misappropriated the trade secrets in Versata’s proprietary configuration software, awarding
Versata $105 million.
$300+ Million Recovered Against Large Insurer
Representation of more than 200 companies with respect to Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan’s ERISA violations in so-called “Hidden Fee” litigation. The first such trial resulted in a $6 million judgment, and subsequent judgments ranged from $315,000 to more than $8 million, with total claims exceeding $300 million. Varnum defended the primary judgment on appeal, where it was unanimously affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and certiorari denied by the U.S. Supreme Court.
270+ Lawsuits Involving “Forever Chemicals” Settled
In the largest environmental tort case in Kent County, Michigan, history, Varnum represented more than 400 Rockford area residents in 270+ separate lawsuits against shoe-maker Wolverine Worldwide and the multi-national chemical manufacturer 3M. The litigation raised issues of first impression relating to decades old dumping of toxic PFAS chemicals, which contaminated drinking water for thousands of area residents. Claims alleged exposure-related illnesses, including multiple cancers and property value loss.
Jury Returns $0 Award in $23 Million Intellectual Property Dispute
Representation of defendant Computer Methods Corporation in a case involving the joint venture development of high-tech tire tag technology between the parties. The trial was in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Bridgestone/Firestone, represented by Jones Day, sued for $23 million and was awarded nothing by the jury in its verdict. The jury granted Computer Methods Corporation over $600,000 of a $700,000 Counterclaim against Bridgestone.
Stolen Van Gogh Artwork Recovered
Representation of Brokerate Capital in a dispute that spurred international intrigue in the art world involving an 1888 painting by Vincent Van Gogh. Brokerarte had acquired the painting “The Novel Reader” in 2017 for $3.7 million and gave temporary possession to a third party, who absconded with it. The stolen painting had been missing for nearly six years when it was discovered in 2023 at the Detroit Institute of Art exhibit “Van Gogh in America.” Varnum filed suit on behalf of the client, demanding that the piece be returned to Brokerarte and not to the unnamed party who lent it to the museum. We successfully settled the matter and returned the painting to its rightful owner.
Dismissal of “Flint Water Crisis” Charges
Representation of a former government official in the highest profile litigation in recent Michigan history, the Flint Water Crisis. We successfully defended the former Director of Health and Human Services throughout the prosecution process, including development of the strategy that led to the dismissal of charges against our client, the former Governor of Michigan and other government officials. Our team’s work was recognized by The American Lawyer’s Litigation Daily.
Successful Resolution of DOJ Antitrust Charges and Civil Claims
Representation of a leading Belgian auto supplier in the Department of Justice’s “Auto Parts” investigation and follow-on class actions. After we successfully secured a full declination of criminal charges, despite the fact that a competitor supplier identified our client as an alleged coconspirator, we led the company’s defense of class action litigation brought in the U.S. and Canada. Our aggressive advocacy enabled us to resolve the case for less than $250,000—an impressive result considering other similarly situated defendants settled for as much as $32 million, excluding legal fees that amounted to millions.
Global Medical Device Leader Wins Jury Verdict in the Eastern District of Texas
Representation of the global leader in arthroscopic surgery, Arthrex Inc., in a patent infringement case in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. After a fast-tracked 18 months of intense discovery, and a week-long trial, the jury found the patents at issue valid and the defendants to have willfully infringed every claim of the patents at issue.
$30 Million Lawsuit Settled for Pennies on the Dollar
Representation of TSC, a public company, in a lawsuit filed by Ford Motor Company claiming that the operational speeds in a complex software package were deficient. Ford asked for over $30 million in damages from TSC initially and demanded a verdict of $14 million at trial. The case was mediated for $6 million against TSC. After a 10-day trial, a jury awarded $3.1 million to Ford, but the case was settled for substantially less prior to appeal.
Jet Engineers Prevail in Complex, Multi-Jurisdictional Fraud and Trade Secret Action
Representation of a team of American and German entrepreneurs and engineers and their business venture, a jet engine supplier, in fraud and trade secret actions brought in the United States District Courts for the Northern District of Illinois, Southern District of New York, and before the American Arbitration Association. Our client was granted a complete dismissal of all federal cases and an arbitration award of no cause of action for alleged misappropriation and all other claims, following significant motion practice in the federal cases and a full arbitration hearing. The arbitrator further awarded in excess of $300,000 in legal fees to the clients and against the plaintiffs.
Trade Secrets Validated Following Jury Trial
Representation of a gourmet foods company in a misappropriation of trade secret and unfair competition case against two former employees who stole a trade secret recipe/formula for the client’s product, then formed a new company to manufacture and sell their “knock-off” version. After a week-long trial in state court, the jury found the defendants liable for misappropriation and awarded all sought damages. In addition, we secured a permanent injunction preventing defendants from manufacturing their “knock-off” product.
Four-Week Jury Trial Culminates in Successful Claims of Patent Infringement
Representation of plaintiff Teleflex, a publicly traded multinational client, in its claim of patent infringement. The federal jury awarded Teleflex a large monetary verdict and the Judge issued a permanent injunction against defendant, a Spanish company that had been competing with Teleflex.
Multi-Jurisdictional Patent Dispute Settles on Favorable Terms
Representation of Arthrex in a dispute that was tried twice in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. In the first trial, the jury was hung 7-1 in favor of the defendant. In the second trial, Smith & Nephew obtained a verdict that was reversed on a successful appeal to the Federal Circuit. Following additional appeals at the Patent and Trademark Office and the Federal Circuit, a favorable settlement was achieved.
Zealous Advocacy in Patent Infringement Dispute Results in De Minimis Settlement
Representation of GFI, a manufacturer of alternative fuel systems, in a patent infringement dispute. Although the plaintiff IMPCO, a leading alternative fuel systems manufacturer headquartered in California, had a strong patent infringement case against GFI, we were able to raise substantial questions as to the validity of IMPCO’s patent. As a result, IMPCO decided to settle the case by dismissing its lawsuit against GFI.
Trade Secret Suit Dismissed
Representation of a national grocery chain in connection with its trade secret dispute with Tampa, Fla.-based software company Mad Mobile Inc. Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Mad Mobile’s suit claimed the grocer stole and continued to use its proprietary technology, despite previously severing its contract agreement with the company. The court dismissed the case, ruling in favor of our client’s motion to compel arbitration to resolve the dispute.