Main Menu

Cell Tower Lease Sales, Good or Bad?

November 26, 2012
Cell Tower Blog Post

Many property owners with cell towers on their property are getting proposals to sell their interest in the lease for the tower, or similar proposals for leases for cell antennas on the roof or side of a building.  Usually the offer includes granting the buyer exclusive leasing rights for 30, 40, 50 years or in perpetuity.

We are often asked about sales and believe property owners should keep three things in mind:

First, is the sale price a good deal financially? The answer is almost always "No" at the price initially offered. That first offer is a low ball offer and can be increased substantially by hard negotiating or by getting a bidding war going (soliciting competing bids). But there is a bigger issue: Financially property owners can almost always do better on their own simply because the purchasers take such a large slice (30% to 50%) of the gross revenues from the site. Realistically, this assumes the property owner has some degree of business knowledge and is willing to hire knowledgeable lawyers or consultants for assistance. Cell tower leases are sufficiently different from standard real estate transactions that someone specializing in them is needed. The hourly charges for this assistance are small compared to the share a purchaser would take. These charges can be reimbursed, as mentioned below.

We see situations where either the property owner does not have - - or their children or business associates don't have - - the business knowledge or energy to delve into this specialized area of cell tower leases. Or the lease and sale are just too much of a distraction from the main businesses of the people involved. In these situations, selling off the lease and getting a large chunk of cash to invest makes sense. 

The second thing to keep in mind is that from a property owner's perspective the sales documents they're offered are - - in a word - - "terrible." One-sided does not begin to describe them. In fact, we recommend that BEFORE making a "sales" decision in principle, a property owner should ask for copies of the documents they will be asked to sign. And then they should have a lawyer review them so they can see all the downsides involved. The downsides typically are many and steep - -  for example, severe restrictions on the property owner's right to use its remaining lands, reductions in the sales price of the property owner's remaining property by 20% due to grants of rights of first refusal to the purchaser, grossly inadequate insurance provisions, and so on.

Obviously, some of these provisions can be negotiated, but seeing their nature and extent up front is often a sobering wakeup call.

The third point is that if there is a sale, the property owner's legal fees can be reimbursed. The property owner has to ask for it, and purchasers are hungry enough for these projects that they will agree. So if property owners decide to proceed with a sale, they should have a knowledgeable real estate lawyer or cell tower lawyer represent them. The lawyer will negotiate the numerous revisions needed to the forms offered by the purchaser, often increasing the sales price and getting legal fees reimbursed. This will make the documents more fair, reasonable, and protective of the property owner, essentially without charge.

If you are approached about a cell tower lease sale, keep the preceding three points in mind.


Cell tower lease buyouts was the topic of a teleconference I presented on October 30. This can now be purchased as an on demand webinar.

Related Industries

Join our email list to receive legal advisories, informative newsletters and event invites based on topics relevant to you.
Subscribe to Updates
Back to Page
{ footer Image }